UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN COURSE‐INSTRUCTOR SURVEY Spring 2009 DEPARTMENT COPY
Cruz, Ted LAW397S 28900 SMNR: SUPREME COURT LITIGATION Enrollment = 10
S051 Law School Surveys Returned = 10
NO. REPLIES
NUMBER CHOOSING EACH RESPONSE THIS ITEM AVG.
Str Disag Disagree Neutral Agree Str Agree
1 COURSE WELL‐ORGANIZED 0 0 1 1 8 10 4.7
2 COMMUNICATED INFORMATION EFFECTIVELY 0 0 0 0 10 10 5.0
3 SHOWED INTEREST IN STUDENT PROGRESS 0 1 0 2 7 10 4.5
4 STUDENT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION 0 1 1 2 6 10 4.3
5 COURSE OF VALUE TO DATE 0 0 0 0 10 10 5.0
Vry Unsat Unsat Satisfact Very Good Excellent
6 OVERALL INSTRUCTOR RATING 0 0 1 1 8 10 4.7
7 OVERALL COURSE RATING 0 0 0 0 10 10 5.0
Excessive High Average Light Insuffic
8 STUDENT RATING OF COURSE WORKLOAD 0 4 2 0 3 9
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
For the computation of averages, values were assigned on a 5‐point scale so that the most favorable
response was assigned a value of 5 and the least favorable response was assigned a value of 1.
Scanned: 05/29/2009 Printed: 09/14/2015
UT Austin - Ted Cruz Personnel Documents (Course Instructor Survey Summary - Spring 2009)
FOIA - The University of Texas at Austin · April 15, 2024
This document is a Spring 2009 department copy of a course instructor survey for Ted Cruz’s LAW397S class on Supreme Court Litigation at the University of Texas School of Law. It contains aggregated student ratings across eight categories, including course organization, communication effectiveness, and overall instructor performance.
UT Austin Law School